Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
625-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

625-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023235 50.880951)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023178 50.880945,-1.023180 50.880956,-1.023188 50.880966,-1.023201 50.880974,-1.023216 50.880979,-1.023234 50.880981,-1.023251 50.880980,-1.023267 50.880975,-1.023280 50.880967,-1.023288 50.880957,-1.023291 50.880946,-1.023289 50.880935,-1.023281 50.880925,-1.023269 50.880917,-1.023253 50.880911,-1.023235 50.880909,-1.023218 50.880911,-1.023202 50.880916,-1.023189 50.880924,-1.023181 50.880934,-1.023178 50.880945)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL